Eating Muffins

Halme Polvinen Family Collective. You will all be assillymated

  • Yet another Goldberg

    by

    Posted by Sari

    I have been surfing radio stations on the net to find good classical stations that are not all about lollipops, like Sir Thomas Beecham used to call the short easy favourites. I was listening to Classical KingFM (a very good choise because as it is night in West Coast when I am working, they play whole works), and tuned in just in time to hear the tail end of the Goldberg Variations. And had to stop working because that was not backround music. Modern piano, beautiful touch, clear, gorgeous sound. I had almost forgotten how it feels when an interpretation really hits all your buttons.

    The thing is, I already have two great Goldberg’s. Gould’s 1981 version which is idiosyncratic but defenitely worth all the hype, and Leonhardt’s last, precise harpsicord version,  which in its serenity is a wonderful counterbalance to Gould. Even so and even though there are a mindboggling amount of stuff I only have on vinyl or not at all, I think the next time I invest in a CD it just has to be Murray Perahia’s Goldberg Variations. (Sony Classical SK/SM 89243). Just wow.

  • Fan funds

    by

    Posted by Sari

    Now, as I have gotten all that snooty and grumpy anti-fannish stuff out of my system, can I just talk about something I find really cool about fandom: The FanFunds. It is not just that the funds allow a person or persons who might not otherwise have money to attend cons – nice though that  is – it is that all the delegates I have met so far have all been both interesting and interested in the ways of fandom in the countries they visit.

    Jukka was the NoFF delegate in his first Swecon, and he has been back almost every year since, sometimes with a shoestring budget, but always enjoying himself. Kanerva was along at my first Swecon as a NoFF delegate and we had a great time. Jukka really enjoyed meeting this year’s TAFF delegate Suzle at Worldcon, and Damien and Juliette are GuFFing their way through a respectable slice of Europe and were delightful houseguests in their short stop in Helsinki.

    So next time the hat goes around in the Pub for NoFF give generously: Fan Funds are a great way to get to know new people and widen your fannish horizons.

  • Con report

    Posted by Sari

    This is my Worldcon report.

    1. The meeting between Europeans and Native Americans is the closest we have to first contact.

    2. If there is sex in a story, the story automatically becomes about sex. Sex takes over. Thus a panel about asexuality in SF became a panel about sex.

    3. Adverbs

    4. We all know cities are palimpsests. But there are examples of cities that are not: Brasil, the hidden, secret cities of Soviet Union. How about spinning them into something fantastic?

    5. There is a certain interesting dichotomy between the endings of Buffy and Angel: Buffy achieves thematic closure by returning to the original idea of a blonde in the alley kicking monster’s ass by the montage where women everywere are empowered by Willow’s magic. Angel has an open ending, both thematically and narratively.

    6. Man to man kissing on Dr. Who! Way to go!

    7. I want to read some Laura Ann Gillman

    8. Fannish space is safe. It allows self- expression in ways which in mundane space would be read totally differently. Thus it is a space where it is possible to experiment, to be outrageous, sexy or plain weird. Conflicts and problems arise when the values of the mundane space is brought to the fannish space.

    9. “Trollope does not understand dragons?”

    10. Why fandom gets so riled when our writers are represented like they were mainstream authors: because we are not just readers, we are fans. We are like supporters of a League One football team whose best players have been bought to Chelsea, and the journalists are raving about what good job Chelsea is doing nurturing and developing talent.

    11 Clarke felt it necessary to have Strange save a spy of Wellington because he needed him later. She tweaked history as little as possible, even when it was trivial. Stephenson created his own CABAL which had very different interests and power relationship from the original ministers. A large tweak with no apparent reason.

    12. The birth of modern fantastic in the threnches of First World War.

  • GUFF cometh

    Posted by jukkahoo

    Having been more sick than a sick dog, and still not really all that well (then again, am I ever?), I haven’t been able to write, nor post any Interaction memories/report. It’ll come, next week, Roscoe willing.

    This week will include other, of which one of the more pleasant ones is the arrival of Juliette Woods and Damian Warman, this year’s GUFF-winners (GUFF as in Get Up-and-go Fan Fund) from Australia. As most of you probably know, there is a bunch of fan funds around. The most famous of them would be TAFF (Trans Atlantic Fan Fund), which sends fen over the Atlantic, of course. Then there’s GUFF, DUFF (Down Under ie. the opposite of GUFF), TIFF, JPG, BITMAP and our very own NOFF (NOrdic Fan Fund, the one that got me to Linköping in 2002).

    Juliette and Damian are coming to Tammere tonight and continue to Helsinki the next day. As in Tomorrow. Tuesday the 16th. Soon.

    They were forced to change their original plans, which would’ve included Baltic states right about now, with Helsinki around 18th (as in St. Urho’s Mafia), so all this is a bit sudden, but I hope we can cook up a nice meeting of Helsinki fandom for Tuesday. I believe J&D would like to sample around Helsinki during the day, maybe go to Suomenlinna (weather permitting), and generally relax around while sight-seeing. In the evening, they would love to meet local fen at some pleasant and preferably quiet booze-up restaurant (fairly central location), with some spirited discussions and a few beers. How about it, folks?

    I’ll have my phone, you have my email: ring/mail, if you’d like to join us.

  • Raining on Finndom’s Parade

    Posted by Sari

    I have about six pages of notes on programming, and might at some point try to construct some sort of post about that, but now I just feel like being the grumpy granny of the fandom and disagreeing with everyone for a bit:

    Everybody seems to have had a great time at the Worldcon. I didn’t, for various reasons. Don’t get me wrong, there were bits I enjoyed a lot: meeting people I see all too rarely, shopping for Lemsip, seeing what some of my favourite authors look like and discovering some new ones. But all in all, I was less than impressed.

    Some of it was my own attitude. I was not really interested in going in the first place. I was busy, stressed out and short of money and would much rather just stayed home and worked. Thus I was not in the most receptive state of mind to begin with, and I probably was a tougher customer than Jukka who was all bubbling with excitement ready to enjoy every minute.

    Some of it is, that I have come to the conclusion that panel discussions are fundamentally unsatisfying program items – at least for me. Even the best of panels just scratch surface of interesting subjects, most of them are just painfully bad waffling which have very little to do with the title. Sixteen programe numbers and maybe two or three which were worth listening for longer than five minutes. The situation was not helped by the fact that the dealers room was a) devoid of any media dealers b) did not have dealers stocking the work of the authors taking part of the programme, so every time I found an interesting new voice I failed to find his or her work.

    Then there is the duality of the con. It was clearly two different events, one for the fans, one for the pros. The feel of the event was more like a book fair than a convention: fandom as an audience, the pro scene promoting, wheeling and dealing amongst themselves. Some of this is probably because as a foreign neophyte I don’t know the ins and outs of anglo-american fandom, but I really think that the times when fans and pros really intreacted in conventions the size of the worldcon are basically really over if they ever existed.

    Which leads to the next point. If one can see the con as fandom doing it for fandom, as a community event with where one can enjoy the quaint communal hierarchies and jargon, then worldcon can still be a satisfying experience. But if you feel the disconnect the way I felt it through the con, then the participant becomes a consumer. And this consumer paid a shitload of money for ticket to a bookfair where programming was mediocre and not enough of products available to buy.

    Edited to add: I think on reflection this tells more of me than of cons. Jukka who is much more extrovert, more fannish and more ready to put himself on the line had a great con.

  • My feet hurt

    posted by Sari

    That, I think is the most important information. And when my feet hurt I am not a happy camper. Worldcon turns out to be lots like other cons: lots of panels with interesting subjects where participants just wander off to talk irrelevantly about irrelevancies. The one program number so far I have really enjoyed was a panel of Harry Potter -bashing. And that just because it was really catharctic.

    And I have actually watched quite a lot of programming, hoping to hit the jackpot that justifies the format. So far, no go. So I am a bit grumpy and anti-connish at the moment. Okay, lot anti-connish. On the plus side, there have been few authors who have been articulate and interesting in panels so I would like to get (more) of their work. Of course, they are apparently obscure enough not to have their work prominently displayed in the hucksters room. So the only thing I have bought is a Diane Wynne Jones -book I did not have.

    Jukka has been really enjoying himself, actually meeting new people and generally getting with the program admirably. At the moment he is still at the party hotel, while I am already back at the hotel blogging on this darned expensive connection.

  • Scotland calling

    Posted by Sari and Jukka

    I so wish Britain would finally join the rest of the western world in the 21st century, the way nothing quite works is annoying. Take ths internet thing here. You pay by the minute and it takes ages for pages to load. Or wait a minute, maybe it is a brilliant scam to get more money…

    Anyway, we are here and well. My trip from Helsinki to Copenhagen to Heathrow to Glasgow was OK though rather tiring. Most interesting thing was a cafe at heathrow were they handed out pagers which beeped when your oreder was ready.

    Hotel did not like my credit card but luckily the cash machine liked it fine so we were able to pay for the room. See above about the 21st century.

    No we are off to buy supplies (Boots, the heaven on earth) and then on to the con site, see ya!

    jukkahoo: Pretty much the same from here too. Uneventful trip, except that I was happily surprised at my laskimoportti (veinal gate?) beeped at the Brussel airport, leading to a bodily search by this hunk of a man Belgian. Glasgow has been the usual, gray, rough-looking and hilly. Registered yesterday for the con and saw/met quite a few people. Several Finns at Ibis, so no shortage of cab-company, hopefully.

    Ate at Asmaan, a delighfully campy, but foodwise succulent Indian restaurant. Recommended, even if a bit pricey. (Sari: yes Tammy Wynette and Rogan Josh are a combination I never really imagined) Now, as said, to Boots (she is mad, I know) and then to SECC. Let the con begin!

  • Interaction time

    Posted by jukkahoo

    Less than eight hours and my plane will take off from the Seutula airport. Fifteen minutes after that momentous occasion, Sari’s flight will start its journey toward Copenhagen/London/Glasgow. My via is Bryssel.

    Thursday the 4th it’ll start. The 63rd Worldcon. My third, Sari’s first. I still remember ten years ago, when Intersection happened at the same city. John Brunner died, Moscow was bidding for the 2017 Worldcon and the cab drivers were unable to give change for a tenner. I guess some of those things are highly unlikely to repeat themselves, but I’m still sceptical about Glaswegian Taxi services.

    Normal service will resume after the event (8th of Aug), but in case Ibis has a free (or cheapo) connection, we might be sufficiently crazed to post a wee bit of con-stuff here. If not, then not.

    Have a good one!

  • Number three

    by

    ,

    Posted by Sari

    Not such a long time between numbers two and three on my best books ever list. See how approaching deadlines on PhD -thesis increase the need to write something completely different…

    I Guess I am kinda cheating here, so many of my favourite books are actually series, but it is my list and I don’t really care. Third in the alphabetical order comes Martin Boyd’s Langton Quartett, which is clearly less famous work than the previous nominees. Amazon does not even have pictures up.

    Martin Boyd unites two separate spheres of interest for me. First is the novel of manners, second is Australian literature. Boyd was part of Australia’s artistic and social elite: his siblings, cousins, nieces, nephews and even parents were all famous painters, arcitects, potters and other visual artists. His family was also part of pre-wars Melbourne elite,  wealthy enough to divide their time between Europe and Australia. Boyd’s most famous work, the Langton Quartett draws heavily from his own family amalgamating real persons and events with pure fiction.

    Through his alter-egoish narrator Guy Langton, Boyd spins the tale of his family’s life in the pre-first world war Europe and Australia. In the first book, “Cardboard Crown” Guy reconstructs the life of her grandmother Alice through her diary and memories of his relations. In the second and most famous novel in the sequence, “A Difficult Young Man” Guy ponders on the youth of his brother Dominic. Third novel, the exquisitely named “Outbreak of Love” details the marital problems of Guy’s Aunt Diana making the the plot in a way a parallel to the events of the first novel. The last book “When the Blackbird Sings” is the only one which does not have Guy’s distancing narration, but is a straight third person narrative of Dominic’s experience of the First World War.

    I don’t know why Boyd’s novels have charmed me so. Perhaps it is the the love for a time past, and the impending doom hanging over everything in the form of the first world war. (Boyd, a veteran of that war began to write only after it, the war – as Barret Reid has put it – “released in Martin Boyd the blazing anger of a romantic betrayed”) These are novels of a irrevocably past way of life, grasped at the last possible moment. There is also the effort to relate past and present with each other, the search for reasons, sometimes absurd for why people turn up the way they do. And then there is Boyd’s vision of art and life, his pleasure of art and his fear that life was going to destroy it.

    I am also fascinated by the way Langton’s and their class divide their time between two continents settling on neither and always missing the one they happen not to be on. Even though Australia as “the other”, something alien never to be taimed is never a major theme in the novels, the restlesness of the clan does relate to the post-colonial preoccupation with the land and landscape many Australian novelists and poets share.

    But mostly, I think my love for these novels has to do with the integrity and transparency (or maybe I am fooling myself and it is an illusion of transparency) of Guy’s narrative voice. The gentle irony and the disance Guy’s narration gives to the stories makes them extremely readable and beautiful novels, but the real wonder is Guy’s desperate need to explain and understand which allows him to give voice to all of the characters from the secondary characters like the strangely obsessive Hetty and upwardly mobile aunt Baba to – ultimately – his different and misunderstood brother Dominic without becoming just a cipher.

  • Well, I like Jon Stewart so…

    by

    Posted by Sari

    the Wit
    (52% dark, 26% spontaneous, 16% vulgar)
    your humor style:
    CLEAN | COMPLEX | DARK

    You like things edgy, subtle, and smart. I guess that means you’re
    probably an intellectual, but don’t take that to mean you’re
    pretentious. You realize ‘dumb’ can be witty–after all isn’t that the
    Simpsons’ philosophy?–but rudeness for its own sake, ‘gross-out’ humor
    and most other things found in a fraternity leave you totally flat.

    I
    guess you just have a more cerebral approach than most. You have the
    perfect mindset for a joke writer or staff writer. Your sense of humor
    takes the most effort to appreciate, but it’s also the best, in my
    opinion.

    Also, you probably loved the Office. If you don’t know what I’m
    talking about, check it out here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/theoffice/.

    PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Jon Stewart – Woody Allen – Ricky Gervais

    My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

    free online dating free online dating
    You scored higher than 83% on dark
    free online dating free online dating
    You scored higher than 0% on spontaneous
    free online dating free online dating
    You scored higher than 16% on vulgar

    Link: The 3 Variable Funny Test written by jason_bateman on OkCupid Free Online Dating